It’s the much-loved, oft-quoted movie that some believe defines the very core of male/female relationships.
Of course, I’m talking about “When Harry Met Sally.” Admit it, guys, you’ve seen it, despite its possible categorization of a “Chick Flick.” (Perhaps that’s just because you still fantasize about Meg Ryan circa 1989, but perhaps that’s only my roommate.) Anyway, throughout the movie, the characters debate on the nature of relationships.
Harry believes that “men and women can’t be friends because the sex part always gets in the way.” Sally disagrees, stating that she has “a number of men friends and there is no sex involved.” For Harry, it is black & white: “No man can be friends with a woman that he finds attractive. He always wants to have sex with her.”
As for me, I’m on the fence.
I’ve had a number of male friends over the years, most of which have been 100% platonic. True, there have been the friends-turned-romances in the past which came complete with high hopes for their success, since everyone SAYS you should start out as friends anyway, yet for one reason or another they didn’t live up to the hype. Yet besides this handful, I’ve successfully separated Friends & Relationships, not to mention Sex.
Still, something that Harry says also strikes a chord with me, because though I haven’t dated them, I find MANY of my guy friends attractive. Am I attracted TO them? Not always. But Attractive? Most of the time. Is this a girl vs. guy thing, or does the “Attracted to” vs. “Finding them Attractive” disparity mean more than a gender difference? Not to sound too Carrie-Bradshaw-esque (which yes, I DO get compared to on a regular basis), but this poses the question: Can Men & Women ever REALLY be ‘just friends’?
In my optimistic, rose-coloured glasses view of the world, I would like to say a resounding ‘yes.’ If I found out that my guy friends were only sticking around because somewhere in the back of the head they had some inane fantasy about knocking my boots, well, I’d lose not only respect for them, but some invaluable friendships in the midst of the fallout. I would like to think that we, as the mature adults that we’re at least pretending to be, can handle this ‘separation of church and state’ (in a sexual sense, of course). We’ve got our friends on the left, our love interests (potential or actual) on the left, and never the two shall meet.
Reality? I think not.
Too often, when we’re feeling a little bit down or low or are long-overdue for a boost of self-esteem that only a new crush can bring, we begin to look around and consider our options. ‘What about Joe?’ we say. “We’ve been friends forever. And his new beard is oh-so scruffy and delicious. Perhaps? Could we? Could it work?” This is when I wish the universe had a game-show style buzzer, nixing our irrational thoughts for all the world to hear (and to embarrass us enough to never think them again.) Because honey, 99.9% of the time, no. It will NOT work. Proceed straight to the mirror, tell yourself how fabulous you are single OR attached, and go treat yourself to a Hot Fudge Sundae (with cherry on top, to boot.)
As for guys, well, being a phallic-less gal o’ fantabulousness, I can’t speak for them. I can say, however, that it takes two to tango, or, in this case, NOT tango, as it may be. I’ve not been on the receiving end of many unwarranted advances by someone I would staunchly place in the “just friends” category, meaning either a) I’m not that cute (which I refuse to believe) b) guys can separate “girl friends” and “girlfriends” just as well as we can separate “guy friends” and “boyfriends” or c) they DO want us, but just have better self restraint.
So where do YOU lie? Is Harry’s theory a bunch of hooey, or is Sally a bit ignorant on the matter of relationships even if she CAN fake one hell of an orgasm? Or is it somewhere in between?
Please tell me your thoughts. For once, I’m befuddled.